Ergazo
Describe the work in Korean instead of hunting through menus—from draft to approval and execution.
Employees state what they need. Ergazo retrieves only permitted live data and composes a working surface. Every change begins as a safe draft and reaches a real system only after human review and policy checks.
Review Ergazo against our workflow- An employee requests procurement status and delayed orders in Korean.
- Ergazo retrieves live business data within the employee’s authority.
- It prepares the result and proposed follow-up as a non-executing draft.
- A person reviews the before-and-after diff and approves the policy-checked action.
- Ergazo invokes only the approved business API and records the outcome or failure.
Reach the information and next action without memorizing the ERP menu tree.
“Show this month’s purchase orders. Group delayed deliveries by owner and draft a confirmation request for each.”
- 01Interpret work intent
Resolve order status, delivery risk, ownership, and follow-up rather than treating the request as keywords.
- 02Read live data within authority
Typed APIs return only ERP data permitted by the user’s role and organizational scope.
- 03Compose a working surface
Present amounts, status, delay, and owner in a sortable, filterable table instead of a prose answer.
- 04Prepare follow-up as a draft
Create owner-specific requests and proposed updates without mutating operational data or sending messages.
- 05Review the diff, approve, and execute
Recheck authority, policy, and data version, then execute only the approved action.
Ergazo is not a friendlier chatbot. It is work that can execute safely.
When business AI stops at an answer, the employee still opens another system, finds the right menu, and re-enters the result. Context breaks, and responsibility between a generated suggestion and the real change becomes ambiguous.
Ergazo separates reading, proposal, draft, approval, and application. The model does not write directly to a database; it acts only through typed business APIs with policy checks. Drafts cannot change operational state, and authorization, policy, and data version are rechecked immediately before application.
Natural requests for employees; predictable execution for the organization.
Say the work, not the menu path
Employees describe the outcome in Korean while Ergazo composes the relevant data and actions.
A result becomes a working surface
Tables, status, filters, documents, and approval items support the next judgment rather than ending at text.
Drafts are safe to revise
A model-produced change remains isolated from production until a person reviews and approves it.
Execution is checked again
Changed authority, policy, or data version stops the action; higher-risk work requires an explicit ActionPlan.
Every state change remains visible from request to receipt.
Automation must preserve the difference between what the model proposed, what a person approved, and what the system actually changed.
- 01intent · entity · scope
Structure the intent
Separate target, conditions, desired result, and follow-up action from the Korean request.
- 02RBAC · policy · typed API
Read only permitted data
Apply role, organization, and data-class policy through typed business APIs.
- 03ViewSpec · draft · no mutation
Create the surface and draft
Compose a table, document, or proposed change without mutation.
- 04diff · ActionPlan · approval
Compare before and after
Expose changed fields, targets, impact, and any approval plan.
- 05recheck · execute · receipt
Recheck, execute, and record
Revalidate policy and version, call the approved API, and retain success or failure.
Different business systems follow the same draft, approval, and execution discipline.
Not every module is presented at the same maturity; current connectivity is confirmed against the selected workflow.
ERP, procurement, and finance
Connect purchase orders, receipts, costs, and suppliers to reviewable drafts and approvals.
MES and field operations
Compose production, quality, and equipment state into role-specific surfaces and accountable follow-up.
Groupware and electronic approval
Respect Korean document practices and approval lines from drafting through recorded decision.
HR, CRM, project, and legal work
Apply the same execution boundary across systems with different permissions and owners.
Document support is stated by format and boundary, without implying unsupported conversion.
Format coverage and template fidelity are validated against the organization’s actual documents.
- HWP
- Import path for bringing existing documents into work context
※ HWP is import-only; export to HWP is not claimed.
- HWPX and DOCX
- Paths for structured document generation and export
※ Template and formatting coverage requires document-specific validation.
- Business data
- Typed, policy-checked APIs instead of direct model access to databases
- Higher-risk execution
- ActionPlan, explicit approval, and authorization, policy, and version rechecks
Place a safe AI execution layer over existing systems rather than replacing everything.
Adoption starts with a high-value workflow and defines reading, drafting, approval, execution, and recovery boundaries.
Country adapter and Korean work model
Terms, date, currency, address, document, and approval conventions are separated by adapter; Korea is the base implementation.
Model → Gate → Compiler → Gate → UI
A proposed interface must pass a declarative specification and policy gates before it becomes executable UI.
Typed business APIs
The model cannot run arbitrary SQL or private system calls; contracts carry input validation, policy, and audit meaning.
Progressive adoption
Document sources, permissions, approvers, exceptions, and recovery before moving from read-only to draft and bounded execution.
Turn one recurring Korean-language workflow into a safe execution path.
Show us where employees cross systems and documents today. We will define the reading, draft, approval, and execution boundary together.