Korean-Specialized RAG

Korean RAG quality comes from document structure, morphological variation, organizational terminology, and citation verification—not vector search alone.

Design the path from Korean document ingestion through structure-preserving chunking, hybrid retrieval, reranking, evidence, and access control.

01

Problem definition

Spacing, endings, abbreviations, and Korean-English mixing destabilize recall and ranking in embedding-only retrieval.

A relevant sentence cannot support work if tables, footnotes, and revision state are lost.

  • Korean regulations, manuals, or reports must ground answers
  • Document authority and citations must be audited per answer
  • Sources change frequently but revision state cannot be managed
  • Structured queries can answer the data exactly without retrieval
02

Korean-Specialized RAG: system plate

  1. 01

    Stage 1

    Ingest HWP, HWPX, and PDF while preserving headings, tables, footnotes, and revision metadata.

  2. 02

    Stage 2

    Combine sparse and dense retrieval with morphology, initial consonants, and organizational synonyms.

  3. 03

    Stage 3

    Tune candidate generation and reranking by query type against held-out questions.

  4. 04

    Stage 4

    Validate sentence/table-cell citations, authority filters, and abstention as an answer contract.

A decision and validation view for Korean-Specialized RAG; labels describe architecture, not a measured deployment result.
  1. The workflow begins with Ingest HWP, HWPX, and PDF while preserving headings, tables, footnotes, and revision metadata..
  2. It reaches an acceptance decision through Evidence recall@k and ranking quality.

03

Design method

Korean RAG quality comes from document structure, morphological variation, organizational terminology, and citation verification—not vector search alone.

  1. 01

    Stage 1

    Ingest HWP, HWPX, and PDF while preserving headings, tables, footnotes, and revision metadata.

  2. 02

    Stage 2

    Combine sparse and dense retrieval with morphology, initial consonants, and organizational synonyms.

  3. 03

    Stage 3

    Tune candidate generation and reranking by query type against held-out questions.

  4. 04

    Stage 4

    Validate sentence/table-cell citations, authority filters, and abstention as an answer contract.

04

Application scenarios

Hypothetical application scenario

Korean regulations, manuals, or reports must ground answers

Spacing, endings, abbreviations, and Korean-English mixing destabilize recall and ranking in embedding-only retrieval.

APPROACH
Ingest HWP, HWPX, and PDF while preserving headings, tables, footnotes, and revision metadata.
BOUNDARY
Retrieval hits are not equated with answer factuality.
Hypothetical application scenario

Document authority and citations must be audited per answer

A relevant sentence cannot support work if tables, footnotes, and revision state are lost.

APPROACH
Combine sparse and dense retrieval with morphology, initial consonants, and organizational synonyms.
BOUNDARY
Model memory must not bypass document authority for unauthorized users.

05

Design choices

DecisionGainCostWatch
Korean regulations, manuals, or reports must ground answersIngest HWP, HWPX, and PDF while preserving headings, tables, footnotes, and revision metadata.Retrieval hits are not equated with answer factuality.Evidence recall@k and ranking quality
Document authority and citations must be audited per answerCombine sparse and dense retrieval with morphology, initial consonants, and organizational synonyms.Model memory must not bypass document authority for unauthorized users.Citation correctness and completeness
06

Korean-Specialized RAG: system plate

ItemMethodEvidenceBoundary
Layer 1Ingest HWP, HWPX, and PDF while preserving headings, tables, footnotes, and revision metadata.Evidence recall@k and ranking qualityRetrieval hits are not equated with answer factuality.
Layer 2Combine sparse and dense retrieval with morphology, initial consonants, and organizational synonyms.Citation correctness and completenessModel memory must not bypass document authority for unauthorized users.
Layer 3Tune candidate generation and reranking by query type against held-out questions.Authority leakage and abstention accuracyRetrieval hits are not equated with answer factuality.
A decision and validation view for Korean-Specialized RAG; labels describe architecture, not a measured deployment result.
  1. The workflow begins with Ingest HWP, HWPX, and PDF while preserving headings, tables, footnotes, and revision metadata..
  2. It reaches an acceptance decision through Evidence recall@k and ranking quality.

07

Validation plan

MeasureMethodPass conditionCaveat
Evidence recall@k and ranking qualityIngest HWP, HWPX, and PDF while preserving headings, tables, footnotes, and revision metadata.Repeated runs satisfy the acceptance threshold agreed during discoveryRetrieval hits are not equated with answer factuality.
Citation correctness and completenessCombine sparse and dense retrieval with morphology, initial consonants, and organizational synonyms.Repeated runs satisfy the acceptance threshold agreed during discovery—
Authority leakage and abstention accuracyTune candidate generation and reranking by query type against held-out questions.Repeated runs satisfy the acceptance threshold agreed during discovery—

08

Constraints and failure conditions

Sources change frequently but revision state cannot be managed

Retrieval hits are not equated with answer factuality.

Structured queries can answer the data exactly without retrieval

Model memory must not bypass document authority for unauthorized users.

10

Durable deliverables

Korean-Specialized RAG decision record
Korean RAG quality comes from document structure, morphological variation, organizational terminology, and citation verification—not vector search alone.Client-owned · Patty-reviewed
Validation harness and acceptance criteria
Evidence recall@k and ranking quality · Citation correctness and completeness · Authority leakage and abstention accuracyJointly maintained
Operations and recovery runbook
Retrieval hits are not equated with answer factuality. · Model memory must not bypass document authority for unauthorized users.Operating-team owned

11

Terminology

Korean-Specialized RAG
Design the path from Korean document ingestion through structure-preserving chunking, hybrid retrieval, reranking, evidence, and access control.
Acceptance criterion
Evidence recall@k and ranking quality
Operating boundary
Retrieval hits are not equated with answer factuality.

REFERENCES

References and primary material

  1. BEIR

    Primary material for the method and terminology.

  2. NIST AI RMF: Map

    Primary material for the method and terminology.